de
en
Schliessen
Detailsuche
Bibliotheken
Projekt
Impressum
Datenschutz
de
en
Schliessen
Impressum
Datenschutz
zum Inhalt
Detailsuche
Schnellsuche:
OK
Ergebnisliste
Titel
Titel
Inhalt
Inhalt
Seite
Seite
Im Dokument suchen
Perfomance based early design in architectural education : framework, methods and experiences / by Işıl Kalpkırmaz Rızaoğlu. Wuppertal, 2024
Inhalt
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Kurzfassung
Nomenclature
Contents
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Motivation
1.2. Problem and Methodology
1.3. Structure and Main Content
Chapter 2
THE STATE OF THE ART OF BPS IN ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE AND EDUCATION
2.1. Framework of the Terminology
2.1.1. Building design
2.1.2. Building performance
2.1.3. Performance based design
2.1.4. Building performance simulation
2.1.5. Design and performance assessment tools
2.2. BPS in Architectural Practice
2.2.1. Historical background
2.2.2. BPS in architecture
2.2.3. Architect as a performer
2.2.4. BPS in early design
2.2.4.1. Efficiency of BPS use in relation to design phase
2.2.4.2. Suitability of BPS tools for early design
2.2.4.3. BPS as a design stimulus
2.3. BPS in Architectural Education
2.3.1. Relevance of BPS
2.3.2. Current use: challenges and possible solutions
2.3.2.1. Technical
2.3.2.2. Pedagogical
2.3.3. Integrated architectural design education: creativity and science
2.3.4. BPS and design studio
2.3.4.1. Design studio and the role of BPS
2.3.4.2. Design studio experiences in the literature
2.4. Conclusion: Research gap and thesis focus
Chapter 3
INVESTIGATING BPS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Methodology
3.3. BPS in Teaching - Survey
3.3.1. Introduction
3.3.2. Methodology
3.3.3 Results
3.3.3.1. Respondents’ Background
3.3.3.2. Courses Utilizing BPS
3.3.3.3. BPS Tools
3.3.3.4. Suggestions and Comments from Respondents
3.3.4. Discussion
3.3.5. Conclusion
3.4. BPS in SDE21/22 - Review and Survey
3.4.1. Introduction
3.4.1.1. SDE21/22: Urban Situations, Challenges, Contests and Scoring
3.4.2. Methodology
3.4.3. Results
3.4.3.1. BPS in SDE21/22 - Review Results
3.4.3.2. BPS Tools in SDE21/22 - Survey Results
3.4.4. Discussion
3.4.5. Conclusion
3.5. Design-Integrated BPS Teaching - Interviews to capture educators’ views
3.5.1 Introduction
3.5.2 Methodology
3.5.3. Results
3.5.3.1. Interviewees’ background
3.5.3.2. Learning from interviewees’ experiences
3.5.4. Discussion
3.5.5. Conclusion
Chapter 4
EARLY DESIGN BPS PLATFORM FOR TEACHING
4.1 Introduction
4.2. Methodology
4.3. Prototype 1: “EnergyPlus UI for Rhino “
4.4. Prototype 2: “Radiance UI for Rhino”
4.5. Testing Prototypes
4.6. Discussion
4.7. Conclusion
Chapter 5
PERFORMANCE BASED EARLY DESIGN TEACHING
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Studio Prototype 1: “Semi-Integrated Studio”
5.2.1. Content, structure and tools
5.2.2. Studio entrance survey
5.2.3. Methodology
5.2.4 Students’ works
5.2.5. Students’ feedback
5.3. Studio Prototype 2: “Integrated Studio”
5.3.1. Content and structure and tools
5.3.2. Studio entrance survey
5.3.3. Methodology
5.3.4. Students’ works
5.3.5. Students’ feedback
5.4. Educators’ Feedback on the Studios – Interviews
5.5. Discussion
5.5.1. Observations during the tests of the studio prototypes
5.5.2. Students’ feedback on the studio prototypes
5.5.3. Educators’ comments on the studio prototypes
5.6. A Framework for Performance Based Early Design Teaching
5.7. Conclusion
Chapter 6
CONCLUSION AND FINAL REMARKS
6.1 Overview
6.2 Limitations
6.3. Contribution
6.4. Outlook
References
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Publications
Appendix
Appendix A
AI: “BPS in Teaching” Survey – Questionnaire summary
AII: “BPS in Teaching” Survey – List of BPS tools
AIII: Interview – Questionnaire
Appendix B
BI: “EnergyPlus UI for Rhino” - Example scripting for building elements and materials: “Heavy Construction Wall”
BII: “EnergyPlus UI for Rhino” - Example scripting for building elements with different thermal mass properties
BIII: “EnergyPlus UI for Rhino” – Settings GUI
BIV: “Radiance UI for Rhino” – Example daylight factor analysis
BV: “Radiance UI for Rhino” – Example radiation analysis
BVI: “Radiance UI for Rhino” – Example shadow range analysis
Appendix C
CI: Semi-integrated Studio – Syllabus
CII: Semi-integrated Studio – Entrance survey
CIII: Semi-integrated Studio – Example “Assignment” document
CIV: Semi-integrated Studio – Example “Expectations for Colloquium” document
CV: Semi-integrated Studio – Evaluation Survey
CVI: Integrated Studio – Syllabus
CVII: Integrated Studio – Entrance Survey
CVIII: Integrated Studio – Example “Assignment” document
CIX: Integrated Studio – Example “Expectations for Colloquium” document
CX: Integrated Studio – Students’ Posters
CXI: Integrated Studio – Evaluation Survey
CXII: Studio Interview – Presentation